How to Build a Trading Plan for City Traders Imperium

About City Traders Imperium

City Traders Imperium (CTI) is a UK-based proprietary trading firm known for a non-traditional approach within the prop firm industry. Two features distinguish them: a genuine emphasis on trader education and community, and the availability of instant funding programs that allow traders to bypass the evaluation phase.

Account sizes: $2.5K, $10K, $20K, $50K, $100K, $200K.

Evaluation model (two-phase): - Phase 1: 8-10% profit target, 5% max daily loss, 10-12% max overall drawdown - Phase 2: 5% profit target, same drawdown limits - No time limit on either phase

Instant Funding: - Direct funded accounts without a challenge phase - Higher fee than the evaluation path - Lower initial profit split, typically scaling up with performance - Same trading rules apply — the evaluation phase is removed, not the discipline requirements

Profit split: 50-75% on the evaluation path, scalable with performance. Verify current rates.

Leverage: Competitive with industry standards — verify current leverage limits on their website.

Educational focus: CTI operates a trading community and provides educational content alongside their funding programs. For traders who are still developing, this creates a different context than purely transactional prop firms.

Note: City Traders Imperium updates their programs and parameters regularly. Verify all rules against CTI’s current website before starting any program. Rules were accurate at time of writing (May 2026).

Why most traders fail CTI challenges

CTI’s educational emphasis attracts traders who are earlier in their development journey alongside experienced traders. This creates a specific failure pattern: traders who engage with the educational content, develop confidence, and then attempt a challenge before their trading is genuinely ready for the discipline constraints.

Confusing education with readiness. CTI’s educational content is genuinely useful. But consuming educational material and being ready to execute a funded challenge are different things. A trader who has completed all the courses but has not forward-tested their strategy for 100+ live trades is not ready for a funded evaluation.

The instant funding trap. Instant funding removes the evaluation phase — it does not remove the discipline requirement. Traders who choose instant funding sometimes interpret “no challenge” as “lower standards.” The rules on the funded account are identical to evaluation rules. Breaching them ends the funded status just as conclusively.

Profit split psychology. Starting at a 50% split is lower than many competitors offer. Some traders respond by increasing risk to compensate — reasoning that higher wins will offset the lower percentage. This is backward. The risk profile that passes the evaluation or qualifies for instant funding should be maintained on the funded account, regardless of the profit split percentage.

Community-driven overconfidence. Trading communities create social dynamics where shared successes are visible and failures are less discussed. A CTI trader who sees other community members sharing winning trades may develop inflated confidence about their own readiness. The evaluation is not a community event — it is an individual performance test.

Not using the no-time-limit provision. Like FTMO and FundedNext, CTI’s evaluation has no time limit. Traders who set arbitrary personal deadlines (“I want to be funded within the month”) create artificial pressure that compromises decision quality.

Inadequate preparation for the lower account sizes. CTI’s $2.5K and $10K accounts have small absolute dollar buffers. At 10% total drawdown, a $2.5K account has a $250 buffer. A single poorly-sized trade can consume a significant portion of that margin. Small account sizes require proportionally more disciplined sizing — not less.

The CTI evaluation rewards the same thing every prop challenge rewards: documented edge, consistent execution, and disciplined risk management. Education and community help develop these — they do not substitute for them.

The trading plan structure that passes

CTI’s educational culture makes this a natural audience for a comprehensive trading plan — more so than the average prop firm trader. A full, well-structured plan aligns with CTI’s stated values about how traders should approach markets.

Complete strategy specification. Instruments, timeframes, entry criteria, exit criteria, position management rules. The CTI community likely has exposure to multiple strategy types — pick one and document it completely. The temptation to “mix approaches” is a common failure mode for traders with access to a lot of educational material.

Risk plan adapted to the chosen program. Whether you are on the evaluation path or the instant funding path, your risk plan should specify: account size, max daily loss in dollars, max total drawdown in dollars, risk per trade as a percentage, and your self-imposed daily stop (below the firm’s hard limit).

Session rules. Which sessions do you trade? London, New York, or both? What are your session start and end times? What is your maximum trades per session? These parameters prevent the extended, unfocused trading that generates overtrading losses.

Community engagement rules. If you are part of CTI’s community, define explicitly when community engagement is input to your pre-market process and when it is not. Taking trades because you saw someone else take them is not rule-based execution.

Educational integration. If CTI’s educational content introduces new approaches or refinements, they go into your plan through a defined review process — not immediately into live trades. New approaches should be forward-tested before deployment in a live challenge.

Position sizing for CTI’s rules

CTI’s range of account sizes creates different position sizing challenges at each level.

$100K account: - 5% daily loss = $5,000 - 10% total drawdown = $10,000 (12% on some programs = $12,000) - At 1% risk per trade = $1,000 per trade - Five full-loss trades = daily breach - Self-imposed daily stop: $2,500

$50K account: - 5% daily loss = $2,500 - 10% total drawdown = $5,000 - At 1% risk = $500 per trade - Self-imposed daily stop: $1,250

$10K account: - 5% daily loss = $500 - 10% total drawdown = $1,000 - At 1% risk = $100 per trade — micro lots only on forex - Self-imposed daily stop: $250

$2.5K account: - 5% daily loss = $125 - 10% total drawdown = $250 - At 1% risk = $25 per trade — nano lots or very small micro positions - This account size is genuinely training-wheel sized. The purpose is to develop the habit of disciplined execution, not to generate meaningful income.

Key insight for smaller CTI accounts: The $2.5K and $10K accounts are not smaller versions of the $100K account — they are a different psychological experience. Dollar amounts this small can feel inconsequential, leading to casual risk management. Apply the same percentage discipline regardless of the dollar amount.

For instant funding accounts: The funded account has the same rules as the evaluation path accounts. Your position sizing should be identical to what it would have been through the evaluation. The instant funding path removes the evaluation phase, not the discipline expectation.

Profit split awareness: Starting at 50% split, you capture only $0.50 of every dollar of profit. At 1% risk per trade on a $50K account, a winning trade at 1:2 R:R nets $500 gross, $250 net. Protect these gains carefully — they require twice as many winning trades to offset a loss than at a 100% split.

The daily routine that protects your account

CTI’s educational emphasis creates an ideal context for a structured daily routine — traders in this community tend to be receptive to structured approaches.

TradingPlan’s routine builder structures the day across five phases, each of which directly supports CTI evaluation success:

Weekend Review: Review the prior week’s trades and assess compliance with your strategy rules. How many trades were rule-compliant? How many were taken because of community discussion or external influence? Review your drawdown status. If using CTI’s educational resources, identify any specific insights from the week that belong in your plan — not in your next session.

Pre-Market: Run your market analysis process independently before engaging with community channels. Form your own view, identify your own trade candidates, mark your own key levels. Then check community discussion as a secondary input. This prevents community bias from replacing individual analysis.

Check the economic calendar. CTI’s active community often discusses upcoming news events — still apply your personal news-event rule regardless of what others plan to do.

Live Session: Execute your rule-compliant setups. On small accounts ($2.5K-$10K), the temptation to scale up quickly is stronger because the dollar P&L feels insignificant. Resist this — the percentage discipline is the skill being developed, not the dollar amount.

Post-Market: Log every trade. For CTI traders who engage with the community, a useful discipline is to review every trade before sharing it publicly. Trades that you would not share because they were not rule-compliant are exactly the trades your post-market review should focus on.

Periodic Review: Weekly, review your phase progress and drawdown usage. If CTI’s educational content introduced new ideas during the week, decide whether they belong in your plan — and if yes, when they will be tested and incorporated.

Common mistakes that bust CTI accounts

1. Trying to trade every approach you learn. CTI’s educational depth is a strength — but trading 4 different strategies simultaneously is not. Master one approach, document it completely, and trade it consistently.

2. Treating instant funding as lower-stakes than the evaluation path. You paid more for instant funding than for the evaluation. The funded account rules are identical. If anything, the stakes are higher — you bought direct access to capital, and a breach removes it.

3. Taking community trades without independent confirmation. “Someone in the community is long EUR/USD” is not a trading signal. It is information. Whether it constitutes a valid signal according to your plan is a separate determination.

4. Under-sizing community accounts. The $2.5K account is not a simulator — it has real rules and real consequences. Trade it with the same process you would use on a $100K account.

5. Over-committing to the profit split math. At 50% split, the numbers look discouraging early on. Traders either quit before the split scales, or over-trade to compensate. Neither is the answer. The split is the cost of access to capital. Trade the process; let the split take care of itself.

6. Not separating educational input from trading input. Reading about new approaches, studying different timeframes, learning new indicators — this is valuable. It goes into your plan through a testing process, not directly into live trades.

7. Phase 2 complacency. CTI’s Phase 2 requires 5% profit with the same drawdown rules as Phase 1. It is not a formality. Apply the same pre-market preparation and session discipline.

8. Ignoring the community’s actual performance data. CTI’s community is a data source — a trader who is consistently profitable and documents their trades is worth studying. But a community’s collective optimism about market direction is not a reliable signal. Distinguish between these.

How TradingPlan helps you stay disciplined for City Traders Imperium

CTI is one of the few prop firms where the stated values — education, discipline, structured approach — align closely with what it takes to pass their evaluation and maintain a funded account. TradingPlan is built on the same values.

TradingPlan gives CTI traders a structured home for everything that CTI’s educational content emphasises.

Complete strategy documentation. Everything you have learned through CTI’s educational resources can be organised into a coherent strategy specification in TradingPlan. One strategy, documented completely, with every criteria listed as a checklist item.

Risk plan for every account size. Whether you are on a $2.5K training account or a $100K funded account, your risk plan stores the relevant numbers: daily loss limit in dollars, total drawdown ceiling, risk per trade, self-imposed daily stop. The process is identical at every size.

Routine that incorporates community input at the right stage. Pre-market analysis first, community discussion second. This order ensures your independent analysis is not displaced by social dynamics. The routine encodes the right sequence.

Trade logging for compliance review. Every trade logged. Before sharing in the community, review the log: was this trade rule-compliant? This creates an accountability mechanism that reinforces the discipline CTI’s educational content promotes.

Mindset framework for profit split psychology. Document your response to the early 50% split. “The split is the cost of access to capital. I trade the process.” This is a mindset rule you follow, documented in advance, revisited in your periodic review.

CTI’s educational culture creates the context for a structured approach to trading. TradingPlan gives that structure a place to live.

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between CTI’s evaluation path and instant funding? The evaluation path requires completing two challenge phases before receiving funded status. Instant funding grants direct access to a funded account without the evaluation phases, at a higher fee and with a lower initial profit split. The underlying trading rules are the same on both paths.

Is the instant funding path worth the higher fee? It depends on your readiness. If you have a tested, proven strategy and want to avoid the two-phase evaluation process, instant funding provides faster access to capital. If you are still developing confidence in your approach, the evaluation path is lower risk — a breach during the evaluation costs less than a breach on an instantly-funded account where you paid a premium for access.

What profit split does CTI offer? The evaluation path starts at 50% and scales up with performance. The instant funding path may start at a different percentage. Verify current rates on CTI’s website — profit splits have changed over time.

Does CTI have a trading community? Yes — CTI has a well-established community and educational program. This is one of their differentiators. The quality and depth of community engagement varies over time; assess the current state of the community independently.

Is there a time limit on CTI’s evaluation? No — CTI’s evaluation phases have no time limit. Take as long as needed to reach the profit target without breaching drawdown rules. The absence of a deadline is a significant advantage — never manufacture urgency that the evaluation does not impose.

What account sizes are available? $2.5K, $10K, $20K, $50K, $100K, $200K. The $2.5K account is the smallest available at any mainstream prop firm and serves primarily as a very accessible entry to developing disciplined execution habits.

Can I use the funded account with automated trading? Check CTI’s current rules on automated and algorithmic trading. Many prop firms have restrictions or requirements around EA use. Verify before deploying automated systems.

---

Stop trading from memory. Start trading from a plan. Download TradingPlan — free on the App Store.

---